Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 13:15 +0530, RENY PAUL wrote: > >> Thanks for the patch. I have applied all the patches including the >> hacks. > > Could you please back out the hacks again? Denis asked you explicitely > not to apply them and if the hacks are causing problems in gtk-demo, as > you said, then they should definitely not go in.
Is the gtk-demo working on OSX? While optimizing/fixing the backend I came across the OSX backend code and saw that it doesn't do all those things that I wouldn't like to do as well. It does not seem to clip out children when filling rectangles or drawing. It does not recurse during invalidation. As DirectFB is much more like OSX than X11 I was wondering if the OSX backend would be working in that lightweight fashion. The overhead in the DirectFB backend could be further reduced if we follow the OSX backend, unless it's not working or the intensive tasks are just done elsewhere. In that backend the ...clear_area(_e) calls are unimplemented, for example. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
