I'm sorry for keeping discussion without win9x volunteer. On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:23:35 +0300 Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If somebody eventually creeps out of the woodwork and volunteers to >make it work on win9x, I would strongly suggest they used a MSLU-based >approach instead of (re)introducing win9x code and runtime optionality >of win2k-only APIs. (MSLU = Microsoft Layer for Unicode, see MSDN.)
Thank you for info. How about multithreading and memory management APIs? Win2k-and-newer APIs are already introduced for such? Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
