* James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Hi,
> >Its easier than people might think, and it reduces much of the > >code complexity. glib also makes some other prerequisites, so > >I dont see why an glib3-user couldn't be expected to go along > >with an gc ... > > > One of the strengths of glib is that it can be used just about > anywhere. If it relied on a GC, people would need to consider > how that GC interacts with the rest of the application. For > example, if you have Java and glib in the same process, do the > two GCs interact properly? Why should they ? They both allocate their chunks from their own pool, so no one interfers with the other one's memory. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: rsync://sources.metux.de/metux-patches --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
