2016-11-30 9:09 GMT+01:00 Nicola Fontana <n...@entidi.it>: > Il Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:08:13 +1100 Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com> > scrisse: > > > ... > > My normal workflow is to lay things out *roughly* in glade, then > > actually run the app and see what it looks like. > > ... > > This is my workflow too, apart the fact that after the first draft > I prefer to edit the XML files directly. > > I always had problems with glade on Linux (also with glade 2 > and/or with GTK+2) but I never submitted bugs because I'm not > really that interested. If your workflow heavily rely on a GUI > builder, you have 4 options: (1) use glade as is, (2) prepare to > file bugs and wait for the fixes, (3) fix the bugs yourself or (4) > switch to another GUI. You can also push to speed up (2)... but > you are already doing it. >
I'm interested in (3)... I'm not a guru, but I'm able to write some code and fix simple bugs. However building current version of Glade under Windows it's a difficult task for me. The configure script complained with the GTK_DEBUG_CHECK (or something similar) present in the configure.ac. _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
