Il Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:09:29 +0100 pozzugno <pozzu...@gmail.com> scrisse:
> ...
> A simple and clear sequence of instructions:
>
> _set_value()
> _set_value()
> ..
>
> will be transformed in a complex, long and cryptic sequence of
> instructions:
>
> _block()
> _set_value()
> _unblock()
> _block()
> _set_value()
> _unblock()
Hi,
I hope you are missing some fundamental detail because this is a
non-problem.
_my_set_value()
_block()
_set_value()
_unblock
_my_set_value()
_my_set_value()
> I hoped there was another better solution. Actually I'm using a flag
> that is checked in the handler:
>
> refreshing = True
> _set_value()
> _set_value()
> ...
> refreshing = False
This is not equivalent to what you wrote above. This is (roughly)
equivalent to:
_block()
_set_value()
_set_value()
...
_unblock()
A minimal test case exposing the problem would be much clearer.
Ciao.
--
Nicola
_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
