Hi. > Well yes, it is simpler. And, you are correct, it is awkward. I just > had this vision of two g_spawn_async_with_pipes() hooked together. > Running echo output &echo_out directly into lilypond's input &echo_out > as if they "may" share &echo_out. I will need to test/hack this. I > hate hacking. I wish we had more examples here in linux land! > > I just thought it would be more efficient and quicker to send data > directly to lilypond instead of a file location.
Since you're already using g_spawn_async_with_pipes(), why don't you simply execute "/usr/bin/lilypond --output=scale.png -" and then feed the lilyponds stdin through obtained file descriptor that g_spawn...() gives you? Cheers, Tadej -- Tadej Borovšak tadeboro.blogspot.com tadeb...@gmail.com tadej.borov...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
