On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 10:39 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > > that page is just for canvases can be used by/integrated in GTK+; > > QtGraphicsView was added as a reference point. that wiki page is not > > meant to be "let's list all canvases in existence so that people can use > > them". > > from the page: > > "This page tries to collect highlights and drawbacks for the most known > canvases around"
yes; as I said: the canvases are the ones meant to be used/blessed by the gtk+ team. > "Candidates for a new GtkCanvas are marked with a colored row. Other > canvases are just for comparison." again, yes. no need to add *every* single canvas in existence. otherwise I might just add CoreAnimation and WPF or Silverlight. btw, the "candidates" should be un-colored; there are no candidates, and no decision was ever made. > > let's not add stuff that doesn't make sense. > > 2 solutions: > > 1) You let Evas in the list. Someone added it (not me), then don't > give *false* informations on it. The guy who described Evas didn't know it > well. Btw, i just *updated* informations. Again, I didn't add Evas in the > list. as you might have noticed, this is a wiki page; anyone can add stuff. in theory, it should have been removed as soon as it was added; I didn't notice that somebody added Evas after the page was created - and I have a watch on the page. probably flew underneath a lot of radars. > 2) You remove it from the list. which is what I'm going to do. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
