Hi, John Coppens schrieb: > Hello all... > > There must be something terribly wrong somewhere, when I try to find > documentation on operation with GTK+ or GDK elements, I always seem to > get _much_ more documentation from the Python/Perl libraries than from > the actual C interface. I'm sure others noticed the same trend. > > So, why is this? > > - Are the original (C/C++) docs really so scarse they don't appear at > the top of of the list? or... > > - Is something in the google algorithms preferencial to anything but C? > > - Are those docs maybe declared unaccessible by the spider engines? > (by robots.txt or so)
I guess library.gnome.org is just too new and maybe not linked that much yet (I used good to search for sites that link to it and found links inside it). > > - Or are those alternative languages just much more popular than C? > > Which makes this question pop up: Wouldn't it be interesting/practical > to have _common_ documentation. Say, GtkWidget is used in Python like > this, in C like this, etc.? I could even serve as an educational tool > to compare languages. > I though about this several times, but don't think it will work. Too much of the api is specific to the environment. Stefan > > Just idle thoughts... > > John > _______________________________________________ > gtk-app-devel-list mailing list > gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list