On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:21:02 -0500
Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have wanted to learn Ruby for a while now, I could definitely do
> that. Nicola was saying that my Bash idea might be a problem
> because of the spawn time involved with bash.

Whether you can or cannot live with certain "spawn" delays of course depends 
only on how frequent those spawns occur.

> Is Ruby pretty fast
> spawning these secondary programs?
> 
> Is the Ruby shell a true system shell? I am just wondering if I
> could still access ftp, netcat, ssh ect..

You can call external programs without hassle from any compiled or interpreted 
language I'm aware of with a single system() function call. So there's no need 
to contrive some artificial division between "system shell", "interpreted 
language" or "script".

--D.
_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

Reply via email to