El 11/11/07 23:22, Allin Cottrell escribió: > "In 2.12.0 I built in the loaders into the gdk-pixbuf library. > There are no separate loader dlls. This has the benefit that there > are less files in the gtk+ distribution, and there is one less > thing that might go wrong, as the built-in loaders don't need to > be listed in a gdk-pixbuf.loaders file. But ... those who use > gdk-pixbuf but not for jpeg or tiff images, have earlier managed > without the jpeg and tiff dlls... > > "If I get more complaints like yours, I guess I will have to > revert this, and build the loaders separately again." > > Could I put in a vote for building the loader dlls separately, as > before, please? I'm sure I'm not the only one wanting to offer a > minimal stand-alone GTK installation to accompany my app. It's > not a very big deal -- but is a bit of a pain -- to have to > include redundant DLLs in such a package. > > Can I vote to have the loaders separated too? Thanks!!! Programmers should figure out how to package a GTK application on Windows, it isn't that difficult.
Bye. -- Ivan Baldo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://ibaldo.codigolibre.net/ ICQ 10215364 - Phone/FAX (598) (2) 613 3223. Caldas 1781, Malvin, Montevideo, Uruguay, South America. We believe that we are free, but in reality we are not! Are we? Alternatives: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://go.to/ibaldo _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
