[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > We are developing an application (Embedded) using GTK and > Glade(gtk-dev-2.10.6-win32-1), MSYS-1.0.9, MinGW-3.1.0-1.
Please don't send me personal mail about GTK+ on Windows. Use an appropriate mailing list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (You must be subscribed in order to post to the list, see http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list .) > For our embedded application, the memory footprint allowed, maximum it > can be 2MB. That sounds awfully tight. > a) We calculated footprint for small application on Windows. It boils > down to around 7.3MB. > DLL |Size (KBs) > --------------------------------------+----------- > libatk-1.0-0.dll |138 > libglib-2.0-0.dll |614 > iconv.dll |872 > intl.dll |44 > libgobject-2.0-0.dll |222 > libgdk_pixbuf-2.0-0.dll |91 > libgmodule-2.0-0.dll |17 > libgtk-win32-2.0-0.dll |3085 > libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dll |657 > libcairo-2.dll |428 > libpng13.dll |199 > zlib1.dll |80 > libpango-1.0-0.dll |220 > libpangocairo-1.0-0.dll |38 > libpangowin32-1.0-0.dll |58 > GTK Images loaders |256 > Theme engine |~ 300 (max) > --------------------------------------+----------- > TOTAL |~7319 This is not the *memory* footprint you mentioned above. It is the size on *disk* of the DLLs, which is quite another thing. > b) On Linux it is 5.3MB > .so |Size (KBs) > ---------------------------------------+---------- > libgtk-x11-2.0 so |3100 > libgdk-2.0.so |554.2 > libatk-1.0.so |109.7 > libgdk_pixbuf.so |92.6 > libgobject-2.0.so |253.1 > libgmodule-2.0.so |11.3 > libpango-1.0.so |245.6 > libcairo.so |329.4 > libpangocairo-1.0.so |32.9 > libglib.so |584.2 > ---------------------------------------+---------- > TOTAL |~5310 You forget to include here the png and zlib libraries and image loaders, if this list is supposed to be comparable. And anyway, just looking at the DLL and .so sizes is mostly an exercise in futility. > We wanted to remove the widgets which are not required by our > application. Is their any procedure to reduce footprint of GTK+, where > we can trim down gtk, gdk, glib, pango, Cairo??? You presumably do this as part of your *work*? I mean, like, you get paid to do this? I don't. Why don't you experiment? Why don't you have a look at what other companies have done to put gtk+ (and GNOME) on embedded devices. maemo.org is one place to look at. --tml _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
