[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto lo scorso 24/10/2006 14:44: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:39:32PM +0200, Philippe Bertin wrote: > > [...] > >>> Let me indeed do that. I wonder why nobody ever came up with the concern >>> I have; am I that much of a security freak ? > > FWIW, I'll miss the C code generation feature of Glade. My concerns are > not that much with user tweakablity, but more with compactness and > efficiency. Besides, I don't particularly like XML, especially as a data > description language :-/ >
I'll miss it too. This thread is a replica of a similar one spread out a couple of years ago; at that time Glade 3 was still far from being short to come, and there were more a feeling of a flame war than of a constructive discussion. Now I wish to put on the shields one more argument against suppression of code generation features, that is the possibility of using GTK+ based apps on embedded systems. Indeed, on modern desktop and laptop systems storing a 1 MiB xml file and loading and parsing it at runtime is a quite negligible effort, but things changes dramatically on a limited resources embedded system. Does this means that Glade will not be the most appropriate tool to design this class of applications (or that GTK+ will not compete with other widget toolkit :-( on embedded systems)? _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
