Steffen Gutmann napisa?(a):
> Consider the following macros:
>
> #define WindowObject gtk_widget_new(GTK_TYPE_WINDOW
> #define VBoxObject gtk_widget_new(GTK_TYPE_VBOX
[...]
> #define End NULL)
>
> ... allows to write code like this:
>
> GtkWidget *win, *label, *ok, *cancel;
>
> win = WindowObject,
> "child", VBoxObject,
> "child", label = LabelObject,
> "label", _("Hello world!"),
> "wrap", FALSE.
> End,
Well, I don't want to let You down, but to me it looks
totally unreadable because of introducing a non-C-like
syntax. If I want to be readable - I'd rather follow the C-like syntax,
because it's very schematic and despite of its disadventages,
it's quite easy to browse for a developer with some basic GTK experience.
And if I want to be compact - that's what libglade is for.
Of course, it's just MY OWN opinion and it's likely that
someone would disagree with me :-)
Best regards,
Waldek
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kliknij i zacznij dobrze zarabiac. Zyskaj 7% na lokacie!
A moze jeszcze wiecej na najlepszych funduszach!
Oferta dostepna tylko w Open Finance: http://link.interia.pl/f19ae
_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
