Thanks for the reply! That is pretty much what I'm doing currently, although your idea of using a GSList is a much better solution than the weird struct I'm using now :-). Also, I wasn't sure whether to use g_timeout_add or to make another thread to update the slider; I thought g_timeout_add would cause timing to be off (it would unsynchronize over time), but using a GTimer fixed it. The problem I'm currently having is this: I'd like to know when the user is "holding" the slider, that is, has the mouse button pressed on the slider itself, not in the "trough", so that the user can record "over" his previous recording. This is kinda hard to explain, and I'm not sure if it's a good idea from a UI point of view... I've managed to get this by digging into the private struct adjustment->layout->mouse_location, but that is hackish and not stable.... Anyways, I'm just rambling, it works now :-)
Now I just need to hook this up to a GstController... but that's a topic for another list, and I have to read up more anyways. Thanks :-) Cheers, Samuel Cormier-Iijima On 9/7/06, David Nečas (Yeti) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:59:13AM -0400, Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote: > > This is for music editing software I'm thinking about writing. > > Basically, the user should be able to "record" the volume during > > playback by sliding the GtkHScale around. When he plays it back the > > next time, the volume should change according to the way he recorded > > it (i.e. it'll wiggle around by itself during the song playback). > > Connect to the "value-changed" signal of the corresponding > adjustment. In the callback, note the current time and > value and add it for example to a GSList (using prepend, not > append to keep it O(1)). Disconnect when done. > > For replay revert the list, set up a periodically called > func with g_timeout_add(). When the function is called it > gets the current time, finds the value to set (if you save > the current position in the list it can be done with simple > forward search quite efficiently) and sets it, possibly with > interpolation. Remove the func when you hit the end. > > This is quite obvious so, although I could probably patent > it, what I missed in the requirements? > > Yeti > > > -- > Anonyms eat their boogers. > _______________________________________________ > gtk-app-devel-list mailing list > gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list > _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
