On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:35:47AM +0100, Andreas Kotowicz wrote:
> so I have
>
> typedef struct _FooApp
> {
> gchar *app_name;
>
> GtkWidget *main_window;
> .
> .
> } FooApp;
>
> which I use like this:
>
> FooApp *
> create_app (void)
> {
> FooApp *app;
>
> app = g_new0 (FooApp, 1);
>
> app->app_name = g_strdup ("My Foo App");
> app->main_window = gtk_window_new(GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL);
> .....
> }
>
> now somewhere in my callbacks I want to create a messagebox:
>
> void game_over(void *data)
> {
>
> FooApp *app = (FooApp*)data;
> GtkWidget *msgBox;
>
> gchar* message;
> message = g_strdup_printf("GAME OVER") ;
>
> msgBox = gtk_message_dialog_new(GTK_WINDOW(app->main_window),
> GTK_DIALOG_DESTROY_WITH_PARENT,
> GTK_MESSAGE_WARNING,GTK_BUTTONS_CLOSE,message);
>
> g_signal_connect_swapped(msgBox,"response",G_CALLBACK(destroy_game_over_cb),msgBox);
>
> gtk_widget_show_all(msgBox);
> g_free (message);
> }
>
>
> but calling this messagebox I also want to modify some elements of app.
So why do you pass msgBox as *both* the object to connect to
and user_data to g_signal_connect_swapped() instead of just
passing app as user_data?
>
> BTW, is there any difference in memory usage if I use
>
> gchar* message;
> message = g_strdup_printf("GAME OVER") ;
>
> msgBox = gtk_message_dialog_new(GTK_WINDOW(app->main_window),
> GTK_DIALOG_DESTROY_WITH_PARENT,
> GTK_MESSAGE_WARNING,GTK_BUTTONS_CLOSE,message);
> g_free (message);
>
>
> or
>
>
> msgBox = gtk_message_dialog_new(GTK_WINDOW(app->main_window),
> GTK_DIALOG_DESTROY_WITH_PARENT,
> GTK_MESSAGE_WARNING,GTK_BUTTONS_CLOSE,"Game OVER");
>
> ?
In the first case you allocate a useless copy of "GAME OVER"
just to free it again.
Yeti
--
That's enough.
_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
