Vassilis Pandis wrote:

>--- Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Both gtk functions you called emit signals.  Signals are processed in
>>the main loop.  sleep keeps you in the current handler, and the main
>>loop doesn't get any say in the matter until on_druid_pf_finish
>>returns.  I'm not sure I understand why sleep is actually there, but
>>checkout using timeouts instead.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I put the sleep() call to simulate my "networking function" which I haven't 
>written yet. So
>basically the actual destroying of the widget happens in main() and not when 
>calling the gtk_blah
>functions? Makes sense now....So should I do the networking part with threads 
>or should I put a
>gkt_idle_add() ?
>  
>
As Santosh wrote, threads is probably a better idea.

>               
>___________________________________________________________ 
>To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! 
>Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
>
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

Reply via email to