Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > First of all, thanks for your suggestions. > > Actually my app. uses a static layout and the GtkLabels inside this, don't > grown when the text becomes longer. The same GtkLabel behaves ok if it is > inside a GtkTable. So I think I will change the static container.
Yeah, if you mean GtkFixed, abolish it. It should only be used for really special purposes, like maybe on a pocket computer with small fixed display size etc. Even then it is likely better to use other containers for windows that are not heavily packed with many widgets. > My app uses a menu bar and a GtkNotebook. In every tab, I have several > GtkLabels and ProgressBars. So if I choose to use non-static containers I > think I'll need two or three GtkTables for each tab.I have three tabs now > but it is expected to have at least five. > > If I change the static layout + label for a deeper containers hierarchy > (three levels for example)... will I have a lack of performance when loading > the UI? A little unrelated, but at work I use Java and over time I developed this policy: in GUI, prefer coding convenience over performance _nearly always_. (An exception might be e.g. a text area that displays a quickly growing log, like +30 lines per second, there you might need to pay special care to performance.) In your case, performance is less important yet, since you have the dynamic/static layout alternative in the first place. And I assume GtkFixed is not quite convenient too work with either. So, screw performance, there are more important things at stake ;) And actually, performance won't even suffer considerably. So, switch to dynamic layout, it's by far better in nearly all respects and only marginally worse in the others. Paul _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
