On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:07:19PM -0400, Freddie Unpenstein wrote: > > I must say, I wouldn't mind some of the more common functions being wrapped > (if it can be done without excessive overhead).
I would call that bloat even if it was done with #define g_write write You'd soon end up with #define g_COMPLETE_ISO_C_AND_POSIX_API COMPLETE_ISO_C_AND_POSIX_API because it's equally `confusing' to mix strchr() with g_strlcpy(), etc. > If you have to include the original standard header as well, then you end up > with both sets and can (I do from time to time) find yourself accidentally > mixing the original functions with their enhanced glib equivelants. The rule is simple: functions that operate on file names are wrapped. Yeti -- That's enough. _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
