Hi Paul. Why it's not there? The most probable answer is that the indexes, if they were complete, would take up much more space that the original docs. But there are solution to generate indices in your machine. (See below)
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Paul Santa Maria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > grep: /usr/lib/libpopt.la: No such file or directory > /usr/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libpopt.la: No such file or directory > libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libpopt.la' is not a valid libtool archive > make[3]: *** [libegg-toolbar.la] Error 1 ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/code/popt > ... or ... > > EXAMPLE DEVHELP RUNTIME ERROR: > - devhelp => > (devhelp:2783): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1319 > (g_object_ref): assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed This is an internal GLib error, but probably generated because something is not found. > 3. If they aren't ... but could be ... how can I help make > these alternate formats a standard part of the gtk-doc > distribution? Did you think about installing a search engine on your machine? Doesn't take all that much space: http://www.htdig.org/ or http://www.juggernautsearch.com Then you can search all of your docs - even ones you add yourself, text files, etc. John _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list