On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:31 AM Oliver Steffen <ostef...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 4:39 PM Daniel Kiper <dki...@net-space.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 08:15:35AM -0800, Oliver Steffen wrote:
>> > Thank you for the comments, Daniel.
>> >
>> > Quoting Daniel Kiper (2023-02-15 19:27:03)
>> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:40:53PM +0100, Oliver Steffen wrote:
>> > > > Add a new module named boot_loader_interface, which provides a
>> command
>> > >
>> > > I would prefer something shorter than boot_loader_interface. bli?
>> >
>> > Then bli it is.
>>
>> Cool! Thanks!
>>
>> > > > with the same name. It implements a small but quite useful part of
>> the
>> > > > Boot Loader Interface [0].  This interface uses EFI variables for
>> > > > communication between the boot loader and the operating system.
>> > > >
>> > > > This module sets two EFI variables under the vendor GUID
>> > > > 4a67b082-0a4c-41cf-b6c7-440b29bb8c4f:
>> > > >
>> > > > - LoaderInfo: contains GRUB + <version number>.
>> > > >   This allows the running operating system to identify the boot
>> loader
>> > > >   used during boot.
>> > > >
>> > > > - LoaderDevicePartUUID: contains the partition UUID of the
>> > > >   EFI System Partition (ESP).  This is used by
>> > > >   systemd-gpt-auto-generator [1] to find the root partitions (and
>> others
>> > > >   too), via partition type IDs [2].
>> > > >
>> > > > This module is only available on EFI platforms.
>> > > >
>> > > > [0] https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_INTERFACE/
>> > > > [1]
>> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-gpt-auto-generator.html
>> > > > [2]
>> https://uapi-group.org/specifications/specs/discoverable_partitions_specification/
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Steffen <ostef...@redhat.com>
>> > > > ---
>> > > >  grub-core/Makefile.core.def                |   6 +
>> > > >  grub-core/commands/boot_loader_interface.c | 217
>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > >  2 files changed, 223 insertions(+)
>> > > >  create mode 100644 grub-core/commands/boot_loader_interface.c
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
>> b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
>> > > > index ba967aac8..23455fb71 100644
>> > > > --- a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
>> > > > +++ b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
>> > > > @@ -2547,3 +2547,9 @@ module = {
>> > > >    common = commands/i386/wrmsr.c;
>> > > >    enable = x86;
>> > > >  };
>> > > > +
>> > > > +module = {
>> > > > +  name = boot_loader_interface;
>> > >
>> > > s/boot_loader_interface/bli/?
>> > >
>> > > > +  efi = commands/boot_loader_interface.c;
>> > >
>> > > Ditto and below if needed...
>> > >
>> > > > +  enable = efi;
>> > > > +};
>> > > > diff --git a/grub-core/commands/boot_loader_interface.c
>> b/grub-core/commands/boot_loader_interface.c
>> > > > new file mode 100644
>> > > > index 000000000..ccd7fa3d9
>> > > > --- /dev/null
>> > > > +++ b/grub-core/commands/boot_loader_interface.c
>> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
>> > > > +/*-*- Mode: C; c-basic-offset: 2; indent-tabs-mode: t -*-*/
>> > >
>> > > Could you move this to the end of the file? Good example you can find
>> in
>> > > the Xen project [1].
>> >
>> > I personally do not care about this, it was just part of the file I used
>> > as a template. Is this wanted, or can we just drop it?
>>
>> If you do not need it please drop it.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > > > +  guid = &entry.guid;
>> > > > +  *part_uuid = grub_xasprintf (
>> > > > +      "%08x-%04x-%04x-%02x%02x-%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x",
>> > > > +      grub_le_to_cpu32 (guid->data1), grub_le_to_cpu16
>> (guid->data2),
>> > > > +      grub_le_to_cpu16 (guid->data3), guid->data4[0],
>> guid->data4[1],
>> > > > +      guid->data4[2], guid->data4[3], guid->data4[4],
>> guid->data4[5],
>> > > > +      guid->data4[6], guid->data4[7]);
>> > >
>> > > I think this is generic thing and can be converted into a function.
>> > > Similar code is in the grub-core/commands/probe.c and
>> util/grub-probe.c.
>> > > It seems to me it is at least easy to make one function for the GRUB
>> > > core code. Please do that. Of course in separate patch.
>> >
>> > There are multiple representations of a GUID:
>> >  - grub_gpt_part_guid (gpt_partition.h)
>> >  - grub_efi_guid (efi/api.h)
>> >  - grub_efi_packed_guid (efi/api.h)
>> >
>> > I would add a function for the first kind to gpt_partition.h and
>> > partmap/gpt.c that prints into a string buffer (length checked).
>> >
>> > It would be nice to add a format specifier for GUIDs to the printf
>> > implementation,
>> > but that only makes much sense (I think) if the GUID repesentations
>> > could be unified into one first, in a central place.
>>
>> Could you do the unification and introduce format specifier for GUIDs?
>>
>
> Assume there is a common GUID struct.
> Then we have the following options (AFAIK):
> - add a format specifier for it, lets say '%g' or '%y'.
>   This causes problems with the -Wformat checks. We could
>   disable it, but that's a bad idea.
> - use an additional qualifier for %p, for example %p{GUID}.
>   This way gcc will not complain (%p takes void *). But it is
>   ugly if one wants to print a '{' after a GUID.
> - Do not use a custom format specifier at all; just provide a
>   "to-string" function. To print a guid one needs a temporary
>    buffer (less convenient, but still better than repeating the
>   raw printf statement for GUID everywhere, like it is now).
>

I think something like a suffix for %p is a good idea.  Like Linux kernel
does:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
This avoids the warnings about the format string.  I am proposing %pG for
GUIDs.

I am almost done implementing this, incl. the GUID unification, and also
with the
comments from v2.

- Oliver
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to