"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <phco...@gmail.com> writes:
> I like it in general however I had a comment: in future GRUB could be able > to do the same through second approach: load a constructed kexec blob with > all the parts. This would allow to e.g. kexec FreeBSD. This didn't have to > be implemented now. Meanwhile can we use "kexec" as command name? It's fine > to have aliases "linux" and co, just let's have a command line that won't > be broken if second approach becomes a reality I don't think I follow. In this hypothetical future, couldn't we just rename this code to something else and avoid the problem entirely? But maybe I'm misunderstanding. In any case, I don't see support for aliases anywhere, so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Be well, --Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
