On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:08:15PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/17/20 10:58 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:11:09PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > > > Like tpm, the module is only enabled for x86_64, but there's nothing > > > specific to x86_64 in the implementation and can be enabled for all > > > EFI platforms. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zh...@linux.alibaba.com> > > > --- > > > grub-core/Makefile.core.def | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def > > > index 166b444c7..b5f47fc41 100644 > > > --- a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def > > > +++ b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def > > > @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ module = { > > > module = { > > > name = shim_lock; > > > common = commands/efi/shim_lock.c; > > > - enable = x86_64_efi; > > > + enable = efi; > > > > Did you test this with x86 32-bit EFI builds and e.g. ARM64 EFI builds? > > > > Daniel > > It is tested on x86_64-efi and arm64-efi platforms. I don’t have an > environment for x86 32-bit EFI, and I haven’t tested on this platform.
It looks that this patch does not break any builds. So, I took it. Have a nice weekend, Daniel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel