On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:38:04AM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 3/27/20 7:45 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > >> _is_ a 'clear' env expected/recommended/required for a grub2 build? > > > > You control your own build environment. So, if you add options which are > > not supported by the GRUB then there is pretty good chance that the > > build or generated output will fall apart at some point. However, if you > > think a given compiler option should be supported by the GRUB or even > > used by default please provide a patch with good explanation why we > > should take it. > > sure. > > builds using opensuse buildservice online are currently failing using > 'default' build env.
I'm using openSUSE build serive too and (with the package maintainer's hats on) I am sure we didn't use those build options/flags you were testing here `as default`. Neither I could tell where your build options came from. > atm, that appears to be just to due to the patches, discussed here, not yet > landing in release used. No. I don't think so. Simply you should go check your build options, not the patch here. Regards, Michael > i can't yet say what, if anything, of the default _flags_ in use cause a > problem -- need to check again if optimization, as causing a problem here, is > among them. > > >> if so, does this need to be handled at config time? > > > > I am not sure what do you mean by that. > > just a simple check at 'configure' ... e.g. if optimization is set, raise an > error. > > thx > _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
