On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:11:10PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > From 9443713c3d3403a21aac9b39de4bbd097a531dd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vladimir Serbinenko <phco...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:07:47 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] efi/tpm.c: Add missing casts
Have you seen any warnings without this patch? > --- > grub-core/commands/efi/tpm.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/grub-core/commands/efi/tpm.c b/grub-core/commands/efi/tpm.c > index 7475fd87b..32909c192 100644 > --- a/grub-core/commands/efi/tpm.c > +++ b/grub-core/commands/efi/tpm.c > @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ grub_tpm1_log_event (grub_efi_handle_t tpm_handle, > unsigned char *buf, > grub_memcpy (event->Event, description, event->EventSize); > > algorithm = TCG_ALG_SHA; > - status = efi_call_7 (tpm->log_extend_event, tpm, buf, (grub_uint64_t) size, > + status = efi_call_7 (tpm->log_extend_event, tpm, (grub_addr_t) buf, > (grub_uint64_t) size, > algorithm, event, &eventnum, &lastevent); > > switch (status) > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ grub_tpm2_log_event (grub_efi_handle_t tpm_handle, > unsigned char *buf, > sizeof (*event) - sizeof (event->Event) + grub_strlen (description) + 1; > grub_memcpy (event->Event, description, grub_strlen (description) + 1); > > - status = efi_call_5 (tpm->hash_log_extend_event, tpm, 0, buf, > + status = efi_call_5 (tpm->hash_log_extend_event, tpm, 0, (grub_addr_t) buf, Should not you use grub_efi_physical_address_t instead of grub_addr_t? Daniel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
