On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 12:52:37PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:26:30AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.ki...@oracle.com>
This reminds me: as somebody who has direct GRUB commit access but hasn't used it much directly since the new maintenance team took the reins, can I ask if there are established rules written down for how we should be using our commit access these days? It seems that it would probably be more efficient if those of us who have commit access were to push our own patches once they've been suitably reviewed rather than relying on the smaller team of maintainers to do it. Is the rule basically "has a Reviewed-by from a maintainer", or is it more liberal than that? Also, it would be good if this sort of thing were written down in docs/grub-dev.texi rather than just in a mailing list response. (I'd be happy to try to polish a mailing list response into a patch to the developer manual, though.) -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
