On 07/18/2018 05:03 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:10:32PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:33:42PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote: >>> On 07/16/2018 08:06 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote: >>>> In general I am not against reorganization you are mentioning above. >>>> Though I think that then you should rearange Matthew code and repost >>>> it. Of course if Matthew does not object. >>> >>> I can align Matthew's code or if he would like, he is more than welcome >>> to collaborate on the solution. >> >> There's a lot of user demand for TPM2 support in grub, so my preference >> would be: >> >> 1) Review and merge the verifiers framework > > OK, as I said earlier I will post it with some comments and minor > fixes in a week or two. > >> 2) Update the current TPM2 code to match and review and merge that >> 3) Ensure that the functionality matches user expectations and then >> develop a more generic midlayer based on that to support additional TPM >> backends >> >> My concern about doing (3) before (2) is that it may take multiple >> attempts to develop something that works for us, and delay being able to >> provide functionality that people would like to take advantage of. I >> think some real-world use would make the process easier. > > This option works for me too. If Daniel S. is OK with that we can proceed.
I appreciate being asked to review though I think Phil's sign off probably carries more weight than mine. I did review the patches when Matthew posted (which they look good) and there is interest in on my part to see them go in sooner than later. > Daniel > _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
