On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.fors...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 January 2017 at 02:33, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > <phco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> All files in posix_wrap are only for porting code to GRUB with little >> modification. No GRUB-specific code should use it. > > That only explains half of it :-) > > What is better about writing grub_uint32_t instead of uint32_t? (To me > it looks like a pointless indirection.) >
GRUB boot time code is built without any standard headers at all, so there is absolutely no difference between defining grub_uint32_t or uint32_t, in both cases it must be defined in one of grub headers. There is no indirection at all, because no uint32_t exists. For your project you can add defines to avoid non-functional changes and then simply do mass replace ones when porting is complete :) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
