On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 16/11/2016 11:28, Daniel Kiper wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:07:39PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
[...] > >>Uh, the point of the function was to share code between 32bit and 64bit > >>arm platforms which are completely separate archs. > >> > >>There's also effort underway to run with device tree on x86: > >> > >> https://plus.google.com/+ChristopherFriedt/posts/SfDifuC1xsR > > > >OK but right know we build FDT code for every EFI platform. This > >is not nice because not every EFI platform uses/knows FDT (at least > >today). So, I think that we should revert that patch and then you > >can provide another patch which puts FDT code in separate file, e.g. > >grub-core/kern/efi/fdt.c build only on platforms supporting FDT. > >Does it make sense? > > It probably makes a lot more sense to move it to that file rather than > revert the patches, as this is patch 1/2 and you would have to revert > the actual 32bit arm enablement as well, breaking bisectability for > 32bit arm. OK, let's go that way. I am waiting for your patch(es). Daniel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
