If it solves the problem, go ahead Le ven. 18 mars 2016 17:53, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 18.03.2016 16:01, Jiri B пишет: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:26:47AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > >>> [...] > >>> CFLAGS=-ftrampolines -fno-stack-protector -fno-pie -nopie > >>> > >>> So I gave it a try and it seems better (?) > >>> > >>> $ ls -l > /home/jirib/openbsd/pobj/grub-2.02-beta3/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/grub/i386-pc/ > lzma_decompress.im* > >>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jirib wheel 3068 Mar 17 21:45 > /home/jirib/openbsd/pobj/grub-2.02-beta3/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/grub/i386-pc/lzma_decompress.image* > >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 jirib wheel 2832 Mar 17 21:45 > /home/jirib/openbsd/pobj/grub-2.02-beta3/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/grub/i386-pc/lzma_decompress.img > >>> > >>> $ objdump -f > /home/jirib/openbsd/pobj/grub-2.02-beta3/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/grub/i386-pc/lzma_decompress.image > >>> > >>> > /home/jirib/openbsd/pobj/grub-2.02-beta3/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/grub/i386-pc/lzma_decompress.image: > file format elf32-i386 > >>> architecture: i386, flags 0x00000002: > >>> EXEC_P > >>> start address 0x00008200 > >>> > >>> It is OK? > >>> > >> > >> It certainly looks better than before. Does it actually work? > >> > >> We aready use -fno-PIE, looks like we need to explicitly check for > >> -fno-pie as well. > > > > I just booted OpenBSD from "native OpenBSD" grub2: > > > > Good. Please test attached patch. > > @Vladimir: I was unsure whether to add explicit -fpie test, but at the > end I do not see what it buys us. Both options have been introduced at > the same time and we want neither enabled. Current test covers both. > > Is it OK to commit? >
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
