02.03.2016 03:22, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > Is there any way this patch reclaims unused memory in case of partial cache > eviction?
Not yet, I wanted to make sure base looks sane first. Are there any cases of partial eviction besides blocklist write? > If not it could potentially water lots of memory. One thing you > need to consider is that initrd for Solaris can easily be 60% of total RAM > (300 MiB on 512MiB machine) What if requested read is bigger than risk > cache size? > Not sure I parse it; but yes, it puts more stress on cache by requiring unfragmented memory. If we follow this route we need to gracefully fall back to cache element size. Do we have any reasonable chance to separate aligned and non-aligned memory pools? _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
