On Sunday, February 28, 2016, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 28.02.2016 19:40, Andrei Borzenkov пишет: > > You forgot to tag GIT. I think we discussed that release tag should be > > signed, not sure if this is achievable. > > Oh, sorry, was confused that tag name pattern is different from beta2. > We should pick one rule and stick to it (I do not really care which). > > I added signed tag in both formats now. Thank you for reminder. > > > > 28.02.2016 17:21, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > >> Hello, all. I've just released 2.02~beta3. The goal of this release is > >> to chase bugs so that we can move to 2.02 release. So from now on if you > >> think that your patch should be included in 2.02 rather than in 2.03, > >> please add [2.02] to the beginning of your email subject > >> > >> The tarball is available at > >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz > >> and signature at > >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz.sig > >> > >> Signed with following fingerprint: > >> E53D 497F 3FA4 2AD8 C9B4 D1E8 35A9 3B74 E82E 4209 > >> > >> It's also available as a signed tag grub-2.02-beta3 in official git > >> repository. > >> > >> If you don't have xz support alternatively you may consider files > >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz > >> and signature at > >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz.sig > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Grub-devel mailing list > >> Grub-devel@gnu.org <javascript:;> > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel > >> > > > > > > > -- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
