On powerpc-ieee1275 we use mmap_iterate to claim heap, so we can't malloc
here yet. But can we perhaps have at least 512 bytes fit more robustness?

Le sam. 13 févr. 2016 06:36, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> 13.02.2016 03:50, Eric Snowberg пишет:
> > Prevent buffer over-read in grub_machine_mmap_iterate. This was
> > causing phys_base from being calculated properly. This then
> > caused the wrong value to be placed in ramdisk_image within
> > struct linux_hdrs. Which prevented the ramdisk from loading on
> > boot.
> >
> > Newer SPARC systems contain more than 8 available memory entries.
> >
> > For example on a T5-8 with 2TB of memory, the memory layout could
> > look like this:
> >
> > T5-8 Memory
> > reg                      00000000 30000000 0000003f b0000000
> >                          00000800 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00001000 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00001800 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00002000 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00002800 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00003000 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00003800 00000000 00000040 00000000
> > available                00003800 00000000 0000003f ffcae000
> >                          00003000 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00002800 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00002000 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00001800 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00001000 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00000800 00000000 00000040 00000000
> >                          00000000 70000000 0000003f 70000000
> >                          00000000 6eef8000 00000000 00002000
> >                          00000000 30400000 00000000 3eaf6000
> > name                     memory
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowb...@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  grub-core/kern/ieee1275/mmap.c |    5 ++++-
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/grub-core/kern/ieee1275/mmap.c
> b/grub-core/kern/ieee1275/mmap.c
> > index 911bb00..8df4e9b 100644
> > --- a/grub-core/kern/ieee1275/mmap.c
> > +++ b/grub-core/kern/ieee1275/mmap.c
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ grub_machine_mmap_iterate (grub_memory_hook_t hook,
> void *hook_data)
> >  {
> >    grub_ieee1275_phandle_t root;
> >    grub_ieee1275_phandle_t memory;
> > -  grub_uint32_t available[32];
> > +  grub_uint32_t available[64];
>
> Can we make it allocate dynamically according to available_size or is
> memory allocator not yet initialized at this point?
>
> >    grub_ssize_t available_size;
> >    grub_uint32_t address_cells = 1;
> >    grub_uint32_t size_cells = 1;
> > @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ grub_machine_mmap_iterate (grub_memory_hook_t hook,
> void *hook_data)
> >                                         sizeof available,
> &available_size))
> >      return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_UNKNOWN_DEVICE,
> >                      "couldn't examine /memory/available property");
> > +  if (available_size > sizeof available)
> > +    return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_UNKNOWN_DEVICE,
> > +                       "/memory response buffer exceeded");
> >
> >    if (grub_ieee1275_test_flag (GRUB_IEEE1275_FLAG_BROKEN_ADDRESS_CELLS))
> >      {
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to