В Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:47:42 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> пишет:
> В Thu, 5 Mar 2015 19:23:35 +0100 > "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <phco...@gmail.com> пишет: > > > Thank you. Do you know how big the gnulib update would be? > > I was reluctant to do full update before 2.02. Even external-inline.m4 > contains far more changes than I would prefer in this case. > > Here is git diff --shortstat for files included in grub assuming they > do not have additional dependencies. > > 115 files changed, 1003 insertions(+), 521 deletions(-) > That was without m4 ... 867 files changed, 3025 insertions(+), 1812 deletions(-) create mode 100644 m4/count-trailing-zeros.m4 create mode 100644 m4/gc-hmac-sha256.m4 create mode 100644 m4/gc-hmac-sha512.m4 create mode 100644 m4/gc-sha256.m4 create mode 100644 m4/gc-sha512.m4 create mode 100644 m4/gl-openssl.m4 create mode 100644 m4/obstack.m4 create mode 100644 m4/qsort_r.m4 > > > В Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:38:59 +0300 > > Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> пишет: > > > > > В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:34:57 +0300 > > > Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> пишет: > > > > > > > I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream. > > > > What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches > > > > to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd > > > > rather avoid at this stage)? > > > > > > ping? > > > > I went ahead and committed both. They fix obvious bugs, they are self > > contained and do not depend on anything else, they are upstream. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Grub-devel mailing list > > Grub-devel@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel > _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel