В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:23:13 +0000 (UTC)
Justin <j...@gentoo.org> пишет:
> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > В Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:22:23 -0500
> > Mike Gilbert <floppym <at> gentoo.org> пишет:
> >
> > > Recent versions of bash-completion do not provide the 'have' function.
> >
> > It still does as of today GIT.
> >
>
>
> # Backwards compatibility for compat completions that use have().
> # @deprecated should no longer be used; generally not needed with dynamically
> # loaded completions, and _have is suitable for runtime use.
> have()
> {
> unset -v have
> _have && have=yes
> }
>
> All major Linux distributions are using bash-completion version which support
> dynamically loaded completions. Therefor we should cleanup shipped
> bash-completions.
>
> > > To keep things simple, this patch just removes it completely.
> >
> > No, that is not what was intended when 'have' was deprecated. You should
> > put completion for each command in separate function which is then
> > autoloaded on demand.
>
> It was intended that you have one file (or a symlink) with the name of the
> command which will be completed. That means dropping all have and pointing
> symlinks with all support completions will fix it.
>
That was what I meant. Sorry, had to say "file" not "function".
> Or how would you update to recent bash-completion?
>
bash-completion will process /etc/bash_completion.d and will source
current grub completion just fine. But if you want to really adapt
it, just removing calls to have() is not enough; you also need to fix
install target and probably split it in separate files for each command.
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
