On Friday, October 24, 2014, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> We need to re-evaluate how GRUB will boot OS X for the following reasons:
>
> 1. Apple OS X 10.10 (just released) now by default converts for existing,
> and new installs, the partition to use their "LVM-like" technology, called
> Core Storage. Neither GRUB nor Linux can read this format.


I believe there wasn't more published on this. Why would Apple do this? It
makes resizing disks 10x harder...


>  So the xnu module can't locate xnu to directly boot it, nor do
> grub-mkconfig+os-prober even find that there's an OS X installation
> available, to know to create boot entries for it. This is probably the
> biggest show stopper problem; as a majority of OS X users are expected to
> be using 10.10 by the end of the year, if historical upgrade behavior
> applies.
>
> 2. Increasingly, users are using OS X's full disk encryption (FileVault
> 2), which likewise uses Core Storage. GRUB xnu modules can't boot this
> either, even if the user hasn't upgraded to OS X 10.10 (applies to 10.7
> released 4 years ago, and newer OS versions).
>
> 3. The existing GRUB xnu modules don't support signature verification, so
> it's a problem for distributions that create a prebaked grubx64.efi that's
> signed, because potentially arbitrary code can be executed by including the
> xnu module in the prebaked binary. So distributions aren't doing this,
> meaning it's not available, and thus xnu based boot entries for OS X fail
> (and have been failing for a couple years).
>
> 4. Since OS X 10.8 there's no longer a 32-bit kernel, so the 32-bit kernel
> boot option is obsolete.
>
> My suggestion is that GRUB chainload the Apple bootloader, which is found
> on an unencrypted HFS+ formatted volume, with a unique partition type GUID:
> 426F6F74-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC (Apple Boot partition), colloquially
> called "Recovery HD". This used to work with GRUB2 of some version (?) but
> isn't anymore and I'm not sure why.
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42954
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128374
>
> Once the Apple bootloader is chainloaded, it can of course read Core
> Storage volumes, encrypted or not, and properly ask for user authentication
> if the volume is encrypted. So it seems like the simplest solution.


Apologies for my ignorance, but isn't how OS X has traditionally been
booted with GRUB to begin with?

I don't see how this will work. My understanding is that the Recovery HD
contains an install of OS X that is specifically designed to recovery the
OS X copy on the main user partition. Wouldn't chain loading the boot
loader in this partition just boot the Recovery software, and not the
actual OS X system that the user actually intends to use?


>
>
> Chris Murphy
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org <javascript:;>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to