Hi, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Care to send a patch for both help output and documentation? First one should decide whether the incompatible CLI change is really intentional. If the change is intentional, there should be some assistance to those people who based their scripts on the old behavior. A decision would be needed about the desired grade of assistance. me: > > In my personal view, it would be better to keep the behavior of > > GRUB-2.00. E.g. by replacing in grub-mkrescue.c line 229 > > return ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN; > > by a call of xorriso_push() ... i guess ... Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > It won't work. Unknown options are detected before user parser is > called; user parser never sees them. I see. If the change is not intentional, then an own parser would be needed. More or less what the shell code of old grub-mkrescue does. Not an overly demanding task. Don't get me wrong. I will support what gets decided. If new features are needed in xorriso: no problem, just ask for them. Nevertheless, the current state of the change is inconsistent. Implementation and documentation contradict. The most recent statement known to me from Vladimir indicated that he was still undecided, back then. I posted here because i encountered a legacy script which equips a Linux distro by either GRUB-legacy or by ISOLINUX 4. The ISOLINUX part is easy to update to version 5 or 6. Just one more file to copy into the /isolinux directory. The legacy GRUB part needs a total re-implementation on base of grub-mkrescue. This is already quite an obstacle. But telling people that this work will have to be adapted in the foreseeable future to an incomptible CLI change ... Have a nice day :) Thomas _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
