On 06.01.2014 17:29, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Пн, 06/01/2014 в 11:34 +0000, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 12:54:36PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> According to UEFI 2.4 specification, default boot file name on AArch64
>>> is BOOTAA64.EFI (3.4.1.1 Removable Media Boot Behavior).
>>>
>>> ---
>>> util/grub-install.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/util/grub-install.c b/util/grub-install.c
>>> index 8cfe0ea..d3b9db7 100644
>>> --- a/util/grub-install.c
>>> +++ b/util/grub-install.c
>>> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[])
>>> efi_file = "BOOTARM.EFI";
>>> break;
>>> case GRUB_INSTALL_PLATFORM_ARM64_EFI:
>>> - efi_file = "BOOTAARCH64.EFI";
>>> + efi_file = "BOOTAA64.EFI";
>>> break;
>>> default:
>>> grub_util_error ("%s", _("You've found a bug"));
>>> --
>>> tg: (668add2..) u/aarch64-default-boot (depends on: master)
>>
>> Oops - muscle memory override.
>> My only excuse is that current Tianocore Bds for arm* is not conformant
>> to the removable media boot behaviour, so this could not currently be
>> tested. Fixing this is on my to-do list for Q1.
>> Could this be applied please?
>>
>
> Should not grubarm64 be changed into grubaa64 as well, even to just fit
> into 8+3 name? Having them consistent makes life easier. And now is just
> the right point in time before name is set in stone.
>
Agreed. Could you do it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
> 
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
