On 10/27/2013 11:24 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:47:45 -0400
Gene Czarcinski <gczarcin...@gmail.com> пишет:
On 10/27/2013 02:54 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:16:19 -0400
Gene Czarcinski <gczarcin...@gmail.com> пишет:
On 10/26/2013 12:27 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Rejected, similar patches is in trunk since some time.
Thanks. I was not aware that the problem had been addressed. Can you
point me where to look to see what has been addressed?
This is commit 588744d0dc655177d5883bdcb8f72ff5160109ed.
And that sure looks like something I would expect to see from a git
repository!
Look, I am not stupid but I sure am confused! The grub2 website
(http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/) says that all grub2 development done
through bazaar repository and that you get a copy of the latest grub2
source with: |
bzr branch http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/trunk/grub|
Well, I tried doing that and all I get is an error saying: "bzr: ERROR:
Not a branch:"
That's where website lags behind. GRUB switched to GIT a while ago. See
https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=grub
Thank you, thank you. This helps a great deal. In a way, I am not
surprised that you switched to git as I find that most projects I
contribute to are using git repositories and, personally, I find them
easy to use.
Concerning the patches I submitted, if I had access to the repository
before I submitted them, I never would have submitted them. I would
also have saved myself a lot of time and effort because right about the
time this patch was added is about the time I was troubleshooting
multi-device BTRFS.
Gene
As for web site - I do not know; Vladimir, who can edit this?
Now fedora has a local git repository for grub2 located here:
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/grub2.git and when I look at what is there
I see that the updates (when they come in) appear to be in git format.
On other little thing. I I sent this current message there were TWO bug
fixes (TWO patch files). I well believe that the first one was already
in trunk since I had originally reported that problem in January 2013.
The reason I reported it again is because it had not been pick up by fedora.
However, there is that second bug fix which I only recently found and
fixed. This problem occurs when you have /boot on BTRFS either as a
separate subvolume or simply as directory under the root subvolume. In
10_linux, when grub2-probe is call for hint, it returns multi-device
hints separated by "\n" which completely screws things up. The patch is:
diff --git a/util/grub-probe.c b/util/grub-probe.c
index a46f0b1..dd5de00 100644
--- a/util/grub-probe.c
+++ b/util/grub-probe.c
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ probe (const char *path, char **device_names, char
delim)
print_full_name (map, dev);
printf ("' ");
}
- printf ("\n");
+ printf (" "); /* new-line causes problems for multi-device btrfs
volumes */
grub_device_close (dev);
continue;
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
