On 10.04.2013 14:35, Massimo Maggi wrote: > This fact made me assume that there are no licensing problems, however > to ease the merging procedure, a public statement (on the grub-devel > mailing list, as requested from the mantainer) from the original authors > of the code about the legality of this porting would be greatly appreciated. > Regards,
Specifically my main concern is that CDDL code might have been copied when creating those files.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
