Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Mon 05 Mar 2012 02:40:57 +0100, a écrit : > On 05.03.2012 02:35, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Mon 05 Mar 2012 02:30:11 +0100, a > >écrit : > >>>6) menuentry --enabled 0|1 > >>>It's a good practice to show menuentries even if they are not applicable > >>>in different situations (that's common for all major menu systems). If a > >>>menu entry is disabled, it is shown but it is not operable. E.g. one > >>>might have a general grub config file which supports booting a bunch of > >>>ISO images. When an ISO image is not found and instead of not showing a > >>>menuentry for that, those menuentry could be shown as disabled. > >>This seems like just cluttering the view. Remember that in some applications > >>(e.g. braille) menu has to be very concise. We support even the tiny (40x1) > >>terminal geometries. > >Actually, 40x1 is relatively large for a braille device. A lot of them > >are 20x1. > 20x1 works as well. The bare minimum is 5x1 (we need 4 positions to indicate > that there are more entries or more chars in the entry). > For less than 20x1 4 special positions become wasteful and the code should > probably check those explicitly. > Is less than 20x1 common?
No. Samuel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
