Colin Watson wrote: > I wouldn't recommend it. The syntax looks similar, but there are some > slight differences, and Automake has its own ideas of what rules and > variables you are and aren't allowed to override. Besides, there's quite > a lot of stuff that Automake will output even with an entirely blank > Makefile.am; I doubt it would be very much fun to try to merge that into > the current Makefile.in without essentially doing a full port to > Automake. > > (Now if only I had time to actually do such a port ...) > > You may consider this mail: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2006-08/msg00017.html I see following variants for future developpement: - Keep ruby and improve it to address some of its deficiencies - Rewrite system in python. This way merging ruby and python dependencies. - Using automake if it's deficiencies are addressable - Using just GNU make as I proposed and implemented once.
-- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
