On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:16:45PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > 
> > Thanks to the hint from rubisher I looked now at Linux Makefiles.
> > They use this:
> > 
> > NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include)
> > 
> > # ls $(gcc-4.4 -print-file-name=include)/stdarg.h
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.2/include/stdarg.h
> > 
> 
> Robert?
> IMO this makes at least more sense then what we have now
> and I just tested this now with and without a seperate build directory
> with experimental branch and it works
> TARGET_CPPFLAGS = @TARGET_CPPFLAGS@ -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC)
> -print-file-name=include) -I$(srcdir)/include -I$(builddir)
> -I$(builddir)/include -Wall -W

What's the advantage?

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to