On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 14:56 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:48:56PM +0800, Bean wrote: > > > > LUA integration. > > LUA is quite powerful, it's more suitable to do complicated task than > > sh script. For example, we can use it to detect os at runtime, > > implement simple commands, or draw the graphic menu. > > I feel similarly about LUA as I do about writable filesystems. In fact I'm > considering a configure flag so that it's only enabled only when user > requests it. > > But I know both Marco and Pavel feel strongly about this. Please can you > comment?
Ideally, I would prefer GRUB to have one scripting language. I just didn't have time and desire to argue against LUA inclusion. Having more code means more work for maintainers. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
