On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:48:26PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> + int dy;
> + for (dy = 0; dy < dh; dy++)
> + {
> + int dx;
> + for (dx = 0; dx < dw; dx++)
> + {
> + grub_uint8_t *dptr;
> + grub_uint8_t *sptr;
> + int sx;
> + int sy;
> [...]
> + grub_uint8_t f0y = (256 - v) * f00 / 256 + v * f01 / 256;
> + grub_uint8_t f1y = (256 - v) * f10 / 256 + v * f11 / 256;
This kind of variable names make the code too cryptic. Please could you use
more meaningful names?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
