On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:41:38AM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Robert Millan<r...@aybabtu.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:35:21PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> >> +static int
> >> +grub_at_keyboard_keystatus (void)
> >> +{
> >> +  /* FIXME: I don't know if getting key modifier status is possible 
> >> without
> >> +   * BIOS help.  */
> >> +  return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > What we do in these cases is leave the function pointer undefined, which
> > means NULL value (and check this in the caller of course).
> >
> > But in at_keyboard it's definitely possible (check how we handle e.g. CTRL
> > or SHIFT keys).
> >
> Exactly what I meant

Oh, I'm sorry, I sometimes miss things.  Anyway, I hope it's clearer now that
I repeated the same thing :-)

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to