> I think I'll remove GRUB_ASSUME_LINUX_HAS_FB_SUPPORT. It seems that nobody > is going to use it, so all it does is add complexity. This will also make > your patch simpler. > > Is there any objection to that? I'm ok with that. Generally I think that whenever we have the same configuration available at build and config time we should remove build time as it adds complexity for nothing. The only exception I could think of is disabling some features to make code smaller. However I hope we won't have to introduce cherrypicking compiling when user is required to choose core features - it's simply too easy to get wrong and hard to debug > > -- > Robert Millan > > The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and > how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we > still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
