On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 02:17:39AM +0800, Bean wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Pavel Roskin<pro...@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 19:57 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > >> I agree that we have a problem due to lack of leadership, but this is not > >> acceptable. Marco is busy right now (traveling), so please put this on > >> hold > >> untill he's back, then we can discuss it. > > > > I agree that we should not rush with such changes. However, publishing > > patches for discussion and testing is a good thing and should not be > > discouraged. > > Hi, > > Yeah, I don't mean to push it. In fact, I've created a git repository > for my temporary work > > http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/bean.git
Hi, Usually, I only go through the trouble of implementing things when it's clear they will be merged in some form. But I understand it's not the same for everyone. So if I missunderstood, please accept my apology. In any case, this kind of changes need wider consensus, and including the maintainers in it. And in general, I think we should hold off from big restructuring at this time. Using branches is a good idea IMHO (be it "someone's branch" or "pupa2" or whatever). -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
