On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 22:18 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Robert Millan<r...@aybabtu.com> wrote: > >> We actually agreed > >> a while ago that they are bad, but nobody had time to remove them. > > > > I didn't participate in that discussion. Did Marco and Okuji agree with > > this? > No. It didn't really end in a clear consesus either (partially: > everybody agreed to remove trampolines). IMO there is nothing bad in > nested function as long as they don't generate trampolines.
I guess it will be discussed when the patches will be posted. In any case, there is no need for non-static nested functions in this particular case. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
