On Saturday 04 April 2009 04:56:14 Bean wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <ok...@enbug.org> wrote: > > At r2010, Bean added fake_bios_data, and this function calls grub_printf. > > Why not grub_dprintf? Was there any reason to print a message on the > > screen? > > Hi, > > Well, I'm actually planning to move fake_bios_data to a separate > module loadbios, so that linux loader would be cleaner.
I am afraid that you've got a disease of making more modules. This is a bad disease. I have seen some projects which failed in refactoring due to this disease (e.g. Zope3). > The message is > for debug purpose, it could be replaced with grub_dprintf. OK. Regards, Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
