On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:57:50PM +0100, Jan Alsenz wrote: > > > > You took the least relevant part of my argument, and assumed this is the > > reason > > I object to TPMs. Please check the rest of my previous mail. > > I didn't assume that. And I picked this argument because it is the only one I > object! > Because I think it is not an argument... > > > Anyway, it's obvious that I trust my CPU because I have no other choice. > > The > > context in which I said this, is different: there are better choices there. > > ... and since you seem to agree, please don't use it. > > > You seem to assume, that I really like the idea of a TPM, or something like > that. > I can assure you, that this is not the case. My only goal is to keep the > discussion based on facts and reason. Which way too often get lost in this > kind > of discussion (and I want to stress that this is not an accusation to anyone > here).
Thanks for clarifiing, I appreciate your response. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
